Garland web development for the quote that still arrives by email.

Here is an unusual thing to say while selling development: the pages we tested in Garland don't look broken. Median blocking time is 71 ms against 277 ms in our 31-city sample, a large gap that comes from one run per site on a shared test machine, so we'd call it encouraging and not proof. Browser errors showed on 9 of 30 homepages, 30% against 38%, a modest difference. The median best-practices score is 87.5 against 79. So we wouldn't begin with a performance audit unless your own page tests poorly, and if it does, here is how we'd go after it.

We'd begin with the work that arrives by email and gets retyped. Booking showed on 3 of 32 homepages and lead forms on 7, and a portal behind a login wouldn't show in our test at all. For a manufacturer or a supplier, we'd want a quote request that takes a drawing and lands in one place, then an order status a customer can check alone. For a contractor, a job request with photos attached. Our read is that these save staff time, and you can measure that against your own week. Web apps start at $575, depending on complexity, and integrations connect them to what you already run.

Don't let anyone talk you off your platform without evidence. The 14 WordPress sites here post a median speed score of 70.5, and the 9 on other or custom platforms, too few for a trend, post 61, from one run each. A good feature can often live on the site you have, and WordPress development is one way to do it. We also build native iOS and Android apps, from $3,750, for a crew that lives in the truck. Our Garland report carries the rest. Tell us which form your office retypes, and we'd scope that first.